| Title |
Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Energy & Environmental Science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c2ee22019a |
| Authors |
John E. Ten Hoeve, Mark Z. Jacobson |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 42 | 36% |
| United States | 11 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 53 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 95% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Oman | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 12% |
| Engineering | 29 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 33% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#159,639
of 24,475,473 outputs
Outputs from Energy & Environmental Science
#19
of 3,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#705
of 252,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy & Environmental Science
#1
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,475,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.